A blog about marketing, causes and a variety of topics in the “goodsphere”

Marketing your hyperlocal reputation (or just being a good neighbor)

I’ve lived in quite a few different places over the years (Switzerland, NY, Arizona, multiple locations in Germany, etc.) and everywhere I’ve been, I’ve had some pretty interesting neighbors.  In some places, it was really easy to meet people (almost too easy sometimes).  In other places, it was a bit harder.

In today’s increasingly transient world, people don’t stay in 1 place for a very long time and neighborly relationships are getting harder & harder to forge.

A few years ago, Robert Putnam warned in Bowling Alone that our stock of social capital - the very fabric of our connections with each other, has plummeted, impoverishing our lives and communities.   Here are some depressing/interesting factoids from the book:

  • Every ten minutes of commuting reduces all forms of social capital by 10%
  • Joining and participating in one group cuts in half your odds of dying next year
  • Watching commercial entertainment TV is the only leisure activity where doing more of it is associated with lower social capital.

Encouragingly, a new generation of peer to peer online businesses are helping connect “people to neighbors” and reverse the “Bowling Alone” trend.  The NYT recently reported on a couple of interesting new web start-ups that allow people to share/rent their stuff.  NeighborGoods, Snapgoods & sharesomesugar are clawing out niches in the “rent online” world or “access economy.”  Both sites have a very social bent and promote saving $$, resources & rebuilding local community (all good ideas in the current zombieconomy).  Oh, and ladies, please check out this one bagborroworsteal (renting high-end handbags).

I can definitely see these sites working well in college towns and cities.  It will be interesting to see if the e-borrowing concept catches traction beyond the urban areas.  Will Ebay decides to step in and offer a “rent” instead of “buy/sell” section of their site as well?

Having a great reputation helps to sell online & offline.  It always has.  Just being a good neighbor & being a little more social offline can help turn around the very depressing “bowling alone” social capital funk we’ve been in over the past few decades.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Post a comment

Brand “Foreclosure”

Brands are born & then they die.  Some live longer than others, but more often than not there is a clear life cycle.  The magic we invent today can easily die tomorrow.

The pull of the habitual is strong.  Change is hard.  But brand “foreclosure” happens…just ask Circuit City, Netscape and Pan Am.

Here is a list of brands/products that died in 2009 (if someone finds a 2010 list, let me know).

So what brands deserve foreclosure in the near future (including personal brands)?

Let me know what you think.

Enhanced by Zemanta
4 Comments

Leveraging scale with the enlightened billionaires + A new Corp. America pledge soon?

Scale is the stuff of business textbooks and industrial age business models.

It is also a scary word for just about anyone trying to start up an internal or external new venture (but will it scale Ryan?)

The strategy of “leveraging scale” led to 19th & 20th century riches. By smartly  understanding how to leverage scale, some companies have grown unfathomably large and sometimes even “too big to fail.

Guys like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates have also grown rich beyond anyone’s imagination by understanding the power of scale.  So, it is exciting to learn that Buffet and Gates have joined forces to build “philanthropy scale” via the giving pledge, an initiative aimed at getting billionaires to pledge at least half of their net worth to charitable donations.

So far, Gates & Buffet have been pretty successful (40 enlightened billionaires are now signed up). I found a great digital graphic (a must look) on the amount of good this money could do if all the cash was focused on an individual cause.

Crushing the others by themselves

The giving pledge is even more impressive when you consider that “Fab 40″ giving alone crushes the 2009 giving of the entire Fortune 100 (probably even the entire Fortune 500).

Imagine if a couple of giant, enlightened companies led the way with their own form of the Giving Pledge.  Even a meager 1% to 2% of revenue donated by all Fortune 500 companies (per year) would step change the world…vastly increasing the amount of good in the universe.

Some enlightened companies (like Patagonia) have been doing this for a while already.  And hey, people in the US give about 2% (on average) of their income to causes per year.  Aren’t corporations people too?)

So who will stand up and lead the corporate America effort here?  Anyone?  Google?

I predict that a smart, BIG company will pick up on the giving pledge zeitgeist and lead the way–earning loads of goodwill and building massive 21st century brand equity.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Post a comment

Cookie Monsters and Invisible Ad Friends

...C is for Cookie Monster...Image by ???? via Flickr

The appetite for advanced consumer tracking technology online has been exploding over the past few years.

Specialized tracking companies that collect and organize your daily online surfing behaviors have been around for awhile. Recently, however, a new breed of companies that collect and build advanced consumer profiles have been springing up like mortgage dealers in a housing bubble as the online ad market grows.

On one hand, this is good news for interruptive online advertisers because at least ads are becoming more relevant via precise targeting. Advanced tracking definitely helps advertisers become more efficient and maximize ad $$.

Invisible Ad Friends

On the other hand, the level at which folks are being tracked & segmented today via incredibly smart algorithms capturing data from everywhere (social networks included) feels a bit creepy. Though most folks probably realize that their actions are being monitored online (cookies have been around since the good ole’ mid 90s) they might not realize that in 2010, they are quasi opting in forced to surf with an invisible “ad guide.” This “invisible hand of Don Draper” serves up reminders of what people previously viewed online (see this Wall Street Journal article on how tracking across the web has grown more sophisticated).

Where does this leave us? I’m obviously not opposed to all online advertising as a Brand guy. But, I personally think we still have way too much “Digital Fog” on the net. I’m all for more transparency when you surf and/or buy something online. In that context, I really like what Jeff Jarvis says ad supported sites should do about this going forward:

If I were an advertising-supported site, I’d be aggressively transparent. I’d tell you exactly what we track and what impact that has on what we serve in advertising and content. I’d create an app to read the cookies placed just for you and explain them. I’d give you the chance to correct information. I’d give you the chance to select your own advertising (now that would be valuable). I’d treat this with radical openness.

Project VRM

I also like the idea that there needs to be a solution on the consumer side. Why can’t we have “independent” tools that follow us around the web and make recommendations for us (without too much of an agenda?) There are folks out there working on this (see Project VRM). Project VRM is looking into the development of tools by which individuals can take control of their relationships with organizations - especially in commercial marketplaces. It will be interesting to see what Project VRM comes up with…

What are your thoughts here?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Post a comment

Cultural me and Alex Bogusky

The essence of childhood is innocence. The essence of youth is awareness.  The essence of adulthood is responsibility –Andy Crouch

Cultural Me

High culture, low culture, pop culture, ethnic culture, mass/social media dominated culture, political culture…we’re all part of culture in some way.  Today, we create more culture than ever in today’s crazy world of self publishing (blogs, micro blogs, facebook, youtube, etc.).  It is amazing to watch how the collective  consciousness of this world is being built at breakneck pace.

But some of us are better positioned than others to create and influence culture in a recognizable way.

Alex Bogusky

Alex Bogusky is a self described “culture jammer” and arguably one of the most influential creative directors of the decade (Burger King, Mini, etc.).  Adweek anointed Alex with Creative Director of the Decade honors in December.

Interestingly, Bogusky decided to step down from advertising while still in his prime.  The New York Times picked up on the departure of one of the best pop culture ad guys of the “noughties” pointing out that Bogusky wanted to shift gears and help build a different kind of culture:

“Mostly, what I want to do is participate in this cultural revolution that’s happening,” he (Bogusky) added, “happening mostly outside of advertising.”

Revolutionary You

I’m not sure what Alex Bogusky will be doing next, but it looks like he’ll be looking to support a couple of worthy causes.  In a recent blog post, Bogusky “calls out” advertising to children as a issue that needs to be dealt with urgently (especially in the age of childhood obesity).  He ends the post called The first Cannes Lion for not advertising at all passionately with a plea against excessive advertising to our young.  This was pretty thought provoking, so I thought I would post it below:

We all work to bring our personal values in line with our professional life and there are shades of grey to these decisions. But shades of grey don’t exist in our society’s decision to allow millions to be spent targeting an audience that is literally and physiologically incapable of protecting and defending themselves from a message probably doesn’t have their very best interest at heart…there are children and there are adults. And the duty of adults in society is to protect it’s children. And that is black and white.

If you get a chance read Bogusky’s The first Cannes Lion for not advertising at all post in its entirety , it will make you think about advertising’s affect on culture generally and kids specifically.

Enhanced by Zemanta
1 Comment

A few books to pull you away from Twitter this summer

I’m a sucker for summer reading lists (or any reading list).  A lot of the lists overwhelm me, however, because they list so many books at one time and I feel like I want to check them out all at once.  So, I’m just going to list a few that I’m actually reading at the moment.

I recently saw Steven Covey live for the first time, which was great.  Steven reminded everyone about the importance moral authority today (lots of faux moral authority out there).  So, I’ve decided to check out a couple of guys with real moxey in the moral authority space over July.

Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism by Muhammad Yunus.  Yunus is an amazing guy.  He is the Godfather of microcredit and a serious change agent over the past few years.  I pretty much try to read anything he puts into the marketplace and this is his latest book on social business.  I’m halfway into the book & enjoying it thoroughly. Last night I was telling some friends about the book and a random lady from across the table shouted about how much she loved the book.  So we invited her to our table to talk about it.  Kind of strange…but cool as well.

The Cost of Discipleship, Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Bonhoeffer was a Nazi resister and brilliant Theologian.  This man oozes moral authority and even paid the ultimate price for his stance against the evil Hitler thugs.  My sister and her husband gave me a book of Bonhoeffer daily readings and I’ve been enjoying them all year with my wife.  The Cost of Discipleship is apparently Bonhoeffer’s greatest work, so I will check it out.

Drive:  This book doesn’t have much to do with moral authority, but it is an interesting book about why people are motivated to do what they do.  I meant to read this a few months back, but am just now getting through it.  Daniel Pink outlines 3 key elements of deeper motivation (beyond the carrot or stick)

Autonomy- the desire to direct our own lives
Mastery- the desire getting better and better at something that matters
Purpose- the desire to do what we do in the service of something larger than ourselves

I like this simple, post-modern motivation list from Pink; I’m enjoying this book as well.

Have fun this summer.

Enhanced by Zemanta
1 Comment

Why Engagement?

GLENSIDE, PA - MARCH 08:  President Barack Oba...Image by Getty Images via @daylife

I apologize for the irregular postings lately. I will hopefully get into some type of weekly schedule by fall.

Brand teams and brand managers are interested in how much people are engaging with their brand today. Getting people to engage with the brand makes sense intuitively in a world where just about every consumer (myself included) has some dark, nefarious form of 21st century Attention Deficit Disorder.

The problem for the business manager is…how can he/she show that great engagement ultimately translates into top line, bottom line, market share growth or social impact?   Engagement metrics are great (or maybe not so great) but life can get frustrating if engagement metrics are “off the charts” (or at least better than competition) and yet business is in the dumps…

Activity Drives Identity

Don’t get me wrong, I believe in the power of online & offline engagement. If you can get people to pay attention, then things should go well at some point down the road for the business.  Acting can involve the following (txs for the list Bob):

• Reading text (consciously)
• Watching video (consciously)
• Playing games
• Forwarding/sharing/voting/”liking”
• Commenting
• Creating text/graphics/audio/video
• Attending (or participating) in an event
• Signing a petition or donating online

So how deeply do we believe (as marketers) that activity ultimately drives identity? Or is it the other way around.  Is it symbiotic? In any case, when people identify with our brands judgmentally they will be more loyal.

Red Bull does “activity” pretty well…they practically own the Xtreme sport territory today. Obama and his staff probably understand the power of activity better than anyone else. I’m continually impressed with how well the Organizing for America online team keeps pushing their community to do something (sign a digital petition, donate, etc.) for Obama’s latest initiatives–health care reform, finance reform, etc.

Transformational activity

Xtreme sports are fine (well, maybe a bit scary for some) but why not consider transforming things along the way? Pepsi is starting to do this with its Refresh campaign.  Sure, Pepsi is just sugar water, but the Brand guys there are driving positive, transformative activity that will engender loyalty and (some day) hopefully lead to top-line/bottom line growth. Side Note: I’m hoping Pepsi will start getting a little more exposure from the mainstream media with their ambitious campaign. Though I like Apple products, I’m getting a little tired of watching CNN interview Apple fans zombies who queue for days to buy faulty phones.

The case for driving “good” engagement internally and externally is here. According to CSR Magazine, being good pays out. The best corporate citizens list, which includes General Mills and I.B.M. (among others) had a total return on shareholder value of 2.37 percent over three years, while the 30 worst companies had a negative 7.38 percent return”.

Faith Based

Engagement is a bit nebulous.  Measuring engagement is a little tricky and tying it back to top/bottom line results even harder.  But everyone seems to believe in it, so lets not waste any opportunities to do good while we are driving it to another level.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Post a comment

I want my life back

It’s easy to point the finger at Mr. Hayward from BP right now.  Recent callous comments from Mr. Hayward (”I want my life back”) are almost darkly funny coming from an exec who’s likely sweating out the oil crisis in a 5 star hotel and crisscrossing the world via an executive jet when he needs a moment with the family.

Surely Mr. Hayward’s PR team is not happy with the bumbling BP exec.  BP seems to continuously downplay the accident and make slick new ads promising to fix things while they underspend on the clean up effort (though the recent $20 Billion spill fund effort is a step in the right direction).

But really, Mr. Hayward is no different from most of us.  We tend to rarely think beyond ourselves…even in situations where we should so obviously be concerned about those who are suffering the most.

And, although we were not directly responsible for the current crisis, we can shoulder some of the blame.  We’re the one’s investing in mutual funds replete with oil companies and driving gas guzzling SUVs.   We’re the one’s creating all the global demand for oil.  BP makes an incredible amount of money off of us.  Heck, last year alone, BP posted $17 billion in profit.  For perspective, $17 billion was almost double the profit of Apple ($5.7 billion) and Google ($6.5 billion) combined.  In the past three years, the company has generated a staggering $91 billion in cash flow from operations.  I was a loyal contributor to that enormous number.  I often purposefully drove into BP gas stations vs other competitors…I was a believer.

BP was supposed to be the “Green” oil company, right?  Maybe Greenpeace had it right all along.  In 2008, Greenpeace sensed something was amiss with BP’s trustworthiness and awarded them the 2008 Emerald paintbrush Greenwash award.

But Are Consumers Like Us the Real Greenwashers?

Joel Makower just posted an interesting article entitled “Who’s the Biggest Greenwasher of All?” In the article, Makower also takes consumers like us to task saying:

How many (consumers) can say that they are making substantive changes in their daily lives? How many are doing more this year than last? How many have set bold goals about their environmental progress — two, five, or ten years from now?

Compare this to the latest consumer research findings. “Eight in 10 consumers are interested in some type of green product,” according to the latest LOHAS Consumer Trends Database from the Natural Marketing Institute…so, who’s fooling who? Are companies nefariously saying one thing and doing another, or is it consumers who are masquerading as eco-heroes while making only symbolic changes?

In the end, Makower has a point.  If we all want change like we say we do, then we need to start exercising our collective power & start leaving our old fund portfolios, products + marketing/PR plots behind.  We don’t have to live on the extractive stuff of the past; we can help develop the regenerative stuff of the future by driving change ourselves…1 purchase choice at a time.

Maybe things will turn around for BP after this crisis?  And, hopefully Mr. Hayward, like all of us, internalizes that very often those who willingly lose a little bit of their life in defense of something greater, actually wind up “getting their life back” (though life as they knew it may look a little bit different than it did before).

Enhanced by Zemanta
1 Comment

Ku Klux Klan, “Brand Doctor” and the Oklahoma Dust Bowl Crusader

Doctors are generally some of the most trusted people in America (#3 most trusted profession in a recent poll). They also tend to be some of the wealthiest Americans.

For the most part, we love our doctors. “Brand Doctor” works today. If a guy with a white coat & white teeth sells a product on TV, we’ll believe every word he says.

So it’s curious that “we the people” did not forcefully call on doctors & the powerful medical establishment to propose a viable solution for our 50 million uninsured people in the US over the past few years. Where were all the doctors in the debate over the uninsured? Surely they cared most about all the people left behind by our broken “big healthcare” system?

In the go-go 1920s, roughly 100 years before the latest round of healthcare debates, Dr. Michael Shadid cared.

Shadid was an industrious “foreign born” doctor who battled the Klan, racism and the medical establishment to help poor farmers gain access to quality health care in Dust Bowl Oklahoma. Dr. Shadid was a purpose driven doctor who bucked the system and dared to propose an alternative, cooperative business model in the face of traditional thinking.

Dr. Shadid’s book entitled Crusading Doctor highlights his struggle to start the first cooperative hospital in the US. It also shows just how hard the entrenched establishment will fight to keep the status quo. While reading the book, you’ll like be surprised to discover how ruthlessly and violently Shadid’s fellow doctors openly opposed and slandered him. Many of Shadid’s opponents focused on “what’s good for business” instead of “what’s good for poor, under served people.”

Crusading Doctor & Crusading Marketer
After observing the small community of Carter, Oklahoma build a thriving farming cooperative movement (cotton gins, grocery stores, etc) Dr. Shadid founded America’s first cooperative hospital in Elk City, Oklahoma (where I went to high school).

In 1929, Dr. Shadid’s alternative business plan looked something like this…he would organize 6,000 families who would buy a $50 share of stock with which to build and equip the hospital. Then, the community would pick a board of directors and each family would pay $25 per year (pre-payment plan) for their medical and surgical care.

Dr. Shadid set himself incredibly high targets in the beginning (6,000 members). So, he actually had to start the hospital on a discount system. By 1932, Shadid was able to apply the pre-payment plan. Getting to critical mass wasn’t easy, however. Dr. Shadid quickly became famous for using guerilla marketing tactics, word of mouth & CRM in order to gain enough members. He tirelessly promoted his cause, traveling across the country & lecturing on the benefits of preventative medicine and the cooperative model (a hospital owned by the patients).

Lessons from Dr. Shadid
1. Study Sociology, not just Technology: Dr. Shadid was a lifelong learner who kept up with new treatments and new technologies…but, he also kept up on the sociology and ethics of his profession. He was continuously interested in how his profession impacted people and society. This led him to better understand plight of people vs focusing on his own bottom line.
2. Purpose provides fuel in the face of extreme adversity: Dr. Shadid was very clear about his purpose; he wanted to provide quality health care at affordable rates for hard working, low-income farmers. Dr Shadid was slandered repeatedly as organized medical societies and their powerful allies tried to put him and the patient owned, cooperative hospital out of business year after year. He never wavered in the face of adversity, however, and he always put people and purpose out front.
3. Don’t Forget: Dr. Shadid continually remembered what it was like to live with hunger, poverty & lack of heatlh care, while growing up in an impoverished part of Syria. He remembered what it was like to lose patients in good, hard-working farm families. He didn’t forget these experiences & they fueled his desire to drive change.

What has happened to Dr. Shadid’s model?

As the NYT details in this article: It has survived. Shadid built a team of doctors who collaborated closely and were not paid based on how many procedures they performed. Today, this description fits the Mayo Clinic and the Cleveland Clinic as well as less-known groups around the country.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
1 Comment

Identity thoughts

The Thinker (1)Image via Wikipedia

Identity is a pretty complex “umbrella” concept that gets tossed around a lot. If you talk to someone in business/marketing, identity covers everything from a company name and logo, to an entire image or perceived set of values in the marketplace.

If you talk to a social scientist, they’ll use identity to describe a person’s expression of their individuality. Indeed, social psychologists will see identity as it relates to self-image. They will describe to you how people develop mental models of themselves at the individual level.

Years ago, your identity as an individual was pretty fixed. And, if you lived in a caste society…you basically had no chance to develop a new identity. In our increasingly homogenized global world today, however, identities are more fluid. People often struggle to discover their identity (identity crises happen). Some even look to the marketplace of ideas and commerce for answers. Savvy brands are able to step in and articulate lifestyles or create symbolic worlds that people identify with, filling a void.

Thoughts on what this says about our culture in 2010 aside, how can brands discover this magic identity juice? New age brand building will tell you to turn inside to discover how to build a great brand and unlock that hidden identity that everyone loves. Meditate…hole up in a forest and you’ll come back with a solution.

I’m all for reaching deep inside from time to time, but sometimes we just need to form a vision & start going–start reaching outwards instead of focusing on our navels. Having a bias for action instead of waiting for the field of dreams is a key ingredient in moving anything important forward. All too often mental mind models don’t translate into action plans that change the future.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Post a comment