m-cause

We all deserve a break from worry, and we all know excessive worry doesn’t help anything.

But everyone worries…and of course the media feeds our worry urge.  The media normally make us worry via overly sensational articles.  But rarely do they make us worry by overtly telling us NOT to worry (this is strange).

In a recent NYT post 10 things to scratch from your worry list, John Tierney’s asks us not to worry about some pretty controversial points.  That, in & of itself, is a bit worrying because some of his points seem to try and absolve us of responsibility.  This type of mentality is exactly the wrong way to approach the future…we won’t be able to change pressing global issues if we allow ourselves to live in some type of pseudo-denial this summer.

So, I have put my comments beneath (almost) everyone of his “not to worry” points (I am actually worried about 7 of these).  Have a read through…I would love to hear what you think about all of this.

1. Killer hot dogs (Saturated Fat): What is it about frankfurters? There was the nitrite scare. Then the grilling-creates-carcinogens alarm. And then, when those menaces ebbed, the weenie warriors fell back on that old reliable villain: saturated fat.

But now even saturated fat isn’t looking so bad, thanks to a rigorous experiment in Israel reported this month. The people on a low-carb, unrestricted-calorie diet consumed more saturated fat than another group forced to cut back on both fat and calories, but those fatophiles lost more weight and ended up with a better cholesterol profile. And this was just the latest in a series of studies contradicting the medical establishment’s predictions about saturated fat.

If you must worry, focus on the carbs in the bun. But when it comes to the fatty frank - or the fatty anything else on vacation - I’d relax

Ryan’s Comment: I don’t really care what causes the global obesity problem we currently face (the sausage or the bun).  Every other week there is another study on what makes us fat; we consistently hear contradictory messages…next week there will be a study from Timbuktu telling us just the opposite.  Obesity is the real worry here…it is a global problem and even threatens to reduce life expectancy in some western countries over the next generation.  The obesity epidemic was formally recognized by the World Health Organization in 1997 and it is only getting worse.  We need to get a handle on it as I wrote recently here.

2. Your car’s planet-destroying A/C. No matter how guilty you feel about your carbon footprint, you don’t have to swelter on the highway to the beach. After doing tests at 65 miles per hour, the mileage experts at edmunds.com report that the aerodynamic drag from opening the windows cancels out any fuel savings from turning off the air-conditioner.

Ryan’s Comment: We should probably just ride bikes, take the bus, or walk…then we would not really have to be worried about our planet destroying AC.

3. Forbidden fruits from afar. Do you dare to eat a kiwi? Sure, because more “food miles” do not equal more greenhouse emissions. Food from other countries is often produced and shipped much more efficiently than domestic food, particularly if the local producers are hauling their wares around in small trucks. One study showed that apples shipped from New Zealand to Britain had a smaller carbon footprint than apples grown and sold in Britain.

Ryan’s Comment:  So what about the trucks that have to ship the goods in New Zealand to the plane?  John is generalizing quite a bit here…I am not convinced he really did his life cycle analysis work correctly.

4. Carcinogenic cellphones. Some prominent brain surgeons made news on Larry King’s show this year with their fears of cellphones, thereby establishing once and for all that epidemiology is not brain surgery - it’s more complicated.

As my colleague Tara Parker-Pope has noted, there is no known biological mechanism for the phones’ non-ionizing radiation to cause cancer, and epidemiological studies have failed to find consistent links between cancer and cellphones.

It’s always possible today’s worried doctors will be vindicated, but I’d bet they’ll be remembered more like the promoters of the old cancer-from-power-lines menace - or like James Thurber’s grandmother, who covered up her wall outlets to stop electricity from leaking.

Driving while talking on a phone is a definite risk, but you’re better off worrying about other cars rather than cancer.

Ryan’s Comment:  I don’t have much to say here…just that I only know 1 person in my social community who does not carry or use a cell phone (my wife–and she is a journalist!!)  BUT, I admit I still want a new iPhone

5. Evil plastic bags. Take it from the Environmental Protection Agency : paper bags are not better for the environment than plastic bags. If anything, the evidence from life-cycle analyses favors plastic bags. They require much less energy - and greenhouse emissions - to manufacture, ship and recycle. They generate less air and water pollution. And they take up much less space in landfills.

Ryan’s Comment: Missing the boat here…We should not debate paper vs plastic; we should just stay away from both and shop with reusable cloth bags.  My wife and I have been doing this for years.

6. Toxic plastic bottles. For years panels of experts repeatedly approved the use of bisphenol-a, or BPA, which is used in polycarbonate bottles and many other plastic products. Yes, it could be harmful if given in huge doses to rodents, but so can the natural chemicals in countless foods we eat every day. Dose makes the poison.

But this year, after a campaign by a few researchers and activists, one federal panel expressed some concern about BPA in baby bottles. Panic ensued. Even though there was zero evidence of harm to humans, Wal-Mart pulled BPA-containing products from its shelves, and politicians began talking about BPA bans. Some experts fear product recalls that could make this the most expensive health scare in history.

Nalgene has already announced that it will take BPA out of its wonderfully sturdy water bottles. Given the publicity, the company probably had no choice. But my old blue-capped Nalgene bottle, the one with BPA that survived glaciers, jungles and deserts, is still sitting right next to me, filled with drinking water. If they ever try recalling it, they’ll have to pry it from my cold dead fingers.

Ryan’s Comment:  I have no clue about this…

7. Deadly sharks. Throughout the world last year, there was a grand total of one fatal shark attack (in the South Pacific), according to the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida.

Ryan’s Comment: I admit 1 death is 1 too many for me…I am still scared of sharks!  Plus, I swear I have heard about more than just 1 attack over the past year on CNN (but admittedly I have no data).

8. The Arctic’s missing ice. The meltdown in the Arctic last summer was bad enough, but this spring there was worse news. A majority of experts expected even more melting this year, and some scientists created a media sensation by predicting that even the North Pole would be ice-free by the end of summer.

So far, though, there’s more ice than at this time last summer, and most experts are no longer expecting a new record. You can still fret about long-term trends in the Arctic, but you can set aside one worry: This summer it looks as if Santa can still have his drinks on the rocks.

Ryan’s Comment:  I have heard about this, but the way John discusses this it feels as if this is a veiled attempt to show us that he doesn’t really believe in climate change…maybe that is not the case, but ignoring other climate change facts is dangerous and not really responsible.  Check out this article for more of my thoughts on the topic.

9. The universe’s missing mass. Even if the fate of the universe - steady expansion or cataclysmic collapse - depends on the amount of dark matter that is out there somewhere, you can rest assured that no one blames you for losing it. And most experts doubt this collapse will occur during your vacation.

Ryan’s Comment: Look, here in Geneva we are expecting mini black holes to appear soon due to our new particle collider…of course we are worried!

10. Unmarked wormholes. Could your vacation be interrupted by a sudden plunge into a wormhole? From my limited analysis of space-time theory and the movie “Jumper,” I would have to say that the possibility cannot be eliminated. I would also concede that if the wormhole led to an alternate universe, there’s a good chance your luggage would be lost in transit.

But I still wouldn’t worry about it, In an alternate universe, you might not have to spend the rest of the year fretting about either dark matter or sickly rodents. You might even be able to buy one of those Nalgene bottles.

Ryan’s Comment:  Ummm, OK.  Whatever…did not know I needed to worry about this beforehand.  Now I am worried about my lack of knowledge!