To Be (or not to Be) an authentic, out front, brand ambassador
Image by Getty Images When asked to name Brands that leverage their founders as “cult icons” or celebrity “Faces”, you can probably think of several right off the bat…Dave from Wendy’s, Steve Jobs from Apple, Jeff Bezos from Amazon, etc.
The benefits of turning a founder into a celebrity are pretty clear. From a brand equity perspective, you can quickly build brand character and personality as (competent) “founder ambassadors” understand how to authentically communicate the values their compan(ies) espouse. In addition, founders are often inspiring and authentic…if a brand gets it right, these ambassadors can even become cultural icons. Additionally, from a pure cost perspective, you also don’t have to pay expensive celebrity buyout fees.
Deliberate spokespeople (founders, characters, authorities, celebrities, enthusiasts–as classified by Rohit Bhargava) often work well for brands, but can sometimes fall flat (the Bill Gates/Seinfeld ads never received rave reviews. While the “founder spokesperson” idea has been around for a while, a trend that seems to be picking up steam is for employees to step into the public spotlight to become a “Face” or public ambassador for their brand (either deliberately or accidentally).
A (Green) example using a marketer as an authoritative deliberate spokesperson.
Using employees, brand managers or marketing execs., etc. as deliberate spokespeople will likely continue as consumers demand more & more authenticity. Timberland–a fantastic brand with outstanding Green credentials in my opinion–has used marketers and other employees in its Earthkeepers campaign (see this spot). Some have criticized the Earthkeepers ad, saying it might have been more authentic if it would have incorporated the gritty contributions made by consumers found on the Earthkeepers YouTube page. Whatever you think about the polished 2 minute testimonial featuring a values marketing employee, I think it is great to see Timberland getting out there and communicating their enviro-ethos with real employees out front–leading the way.
The trend of companies putting real people “front and center” is not going to wane in this age of corporate mistrust. And, as more and more marketers/customer service reps, etc. get behind their brands on Twitter, the rise of the hybrid “accidentally deliberate” spokesperson will continue. Today, we already see brand representatives building deep consumer relationships via strong customer service and outreach (in the case of RichardatDell). We also see charismatic marketers, simply out there communicating authentically with their communities (see Jeffrey, Chief Creative officer at Threadless). Indeed, getting it right externally for your brand as a new age manager is definitely more an art than a science–but one thing is for sure, you’ll need some PASSION and social networking competency if you want to engage going forward.
Hat tip to Dave Knox for pointing out the excellent post from Mya Frazier.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Re-Kindling your Brand (from Fast Company) (designmind.frogdesign.com)
May 20, 2009
Published in 
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f1eebce4-110a-4a04-b6c4-f924676d331b)

About
Ryan's Picks
Twitter Updates
6 Comments
Ryan, are you reading my mind? So glad to be able to link here to this post as additional ‘proof’ that this concern about representing the brand authentically, and the tactic of using an employee, has some legs. i’m interested to see how and how much social media will affect this process. cvh
For us old guys don’t forget the ultimate CEO celebrity spokesperson: Lee Iacocca. Granted, he wasn’t a founder, but maybe Chrysler should have branded anew and called the company I-Car for I-aCocca. But, that would have too far ahead of the times. Even keeping the name (Chrysler) It might have worked if they had a reasonable business plan. They had the spokesperson. For a while he was more ubiquitous than Jobs and Gates. He was really, really good. Too bad it didn’t work out. The quality of their vehicles was, and is, terrible. So, the spokesperson has to be selling something of excellent quality regardless of the product no matter how impressive they are. Especially now. That’s why people like Jack Welch (who got out in nick of time) and Cheney are headed for the dustbin of history.
@cvh: Would be really interesting to hear more on your brandividual ideas…best of luck on that and keep me in the loop. The rise of online ambassadors (accidental or deliberate) coming form every/anywhere is definitely something new I think, and it will be very interesting to watch going forward.
@bjh: Yep, good ole’ Lee Iacocca was a great example. Good call.
Speaking if Iacocca, he has to give back his company car. Has to turn it in by May 31st or buy it. All former Chrysler execs who have been getting a free car have to do this. Another part of the broken U.S. auto business model I didn’t know existed. Chrysler says this is because bankruptcy rules require it. Well, I bet Jobs would never give back his Apple products, no matter what the circumstances.
Hey Ryan, I must beg to differ with regard to your assessment of the “fantastic” Timberland brand. I have repeatedly been disappointed in the quality of Timberland products, quality markedly poor in comparison to the brand image (and the price point) Timberland seeks to sustain. The last case is a belt that I bought no more than 6 months ago that has already virtually disintegrated. I could kick myself for letting myself be seduced once again by the Timberland company’s well crafted imagery. But hey, I work in advertising, so I drink the cool aid. If Timberland really wants to protect the environment they should start by producing products that don’t end up in the trash after only a few months. I would be delighted if a Timberland employee ambassador would respond to this. But honestly there is no response. Actions speak louder than words, and advertising, and imagery. Fix your products Timberland.
Trackbacks
[...] I’m intrigued by the "rise of the brandividual" and I’ll be presenting a paper on it next week, at the Reputation Institute’s Conference on Corporate Reputation, Brand, Identity and Competitiveness in Amsterdam. I’m not sure whether brandividuals are something ‘new’ or whether they are just a new flavor of sliced bread. I’m keeping my eyes open for interesting examples, and questions, and insights. [...]